HomeArticles * Please note that the piece you are currently reading may not meet our updated editorial guidelines. This might be because of the types or number of sources used or because of our stricter impartiality guidelines. We have kept it online in case the information is useful to you all the same.Many of us are worried about the environmental impacts of livestock, including their greenhouse gas emissions and water use. Wild game meat is often seen as a sustainable alternative, but how much better is it really? Which wild game meat animals are hunted in Europe?From reindeer to rabbits, a surprising variety of wild game meat animals are hunted from the wild in Europe. As well as familiar species such as deer and hare, this includes animals that many people have never heard of, such as mouflon (wild sheep) and chamois (a goat-antelope). Europe has a long history of hunting, and this practice is still very popular both as a sport and to produce meat that can be eaten or sold as food. Sometimes, animals are also hunted for wildlife management: deer and wild boar can be destructive to crops and habitats, so are hunted as ‘pests’. In recent decades, deer and boar populations have boomed, and so have a number of animals being hunted. Red deer harvest has grown particularly fast in Sweden and Spain, for example.3 Environmental advantages of wild meatAs wild meat is hunted for different reasons, it’s hard to make generalisations about its impact. However, it’s clear that wild meat can have environmental advantages over animal livestock. By eating culled animals, we’re not rearing an animal to be consumed as meat, so we don’t have to worry about environmental problems such as the methane that beef cows produce.Population & wildlife damage controlIn some cases, reducing wild animal populations can protect crops and forests. It can also reduce problems for other wildlife, such as the pressure caused by wild boar eating snakes, lizards and other animals.4 Wild game hunting both reduces wildlife damage and provides meat to be consumed. Camosci (Rupicapra rupicapra) grazing in Parco Nazionale del Gran Paradiso, Italy.Environmental impacts of wild game meatHowever, wild meat still has its environmental impacts. Carbon emissions, for example, are often overlooked in the sustainability dialogue of hunting. A recent study about the environmental cost of red deer meat from northern Italy concluded that the main issue is the carbon emissions from hunters travelling to shoot them.5 This could be reduced if the culls were managed to reduce the distance travelled though, so there are ways to increase the sustainability of wild meat. This would require training hunters to increase their efficiency, or using professional hunters who can produce a large harvest in each hunting trip.Exporting wild meatUnfortunately, a lot of game meat isn’t consumed locally. For example, Scotland currently produces around 3,600 tonnes of venison, almost all from the wild, and about a third of this is exported to EU countries.6 The food miles associated with transporting meat between countries increases its carbon footprint.Problems with hunting for sportCompared to meat from culls, animals shot for sport or food may have additional impacts. For example, sometimes animal feed is left out to increase the population of wild animals. Growing this food will have environmental impacts from land and water use, so these factors must also be accounted for.Animals are sometimes reared and released in order to increase the number of “wild” animals available to shoot (even though it isn’t always legal). Perversely, this can increase the population numbers of animals like boar, leading to more environmental damage. Pheasant bird and hunting dog.How can you make informed choices?The huge variety of wild meat means that choices can be baffling, but there are a few easy ways to help choose sustainable meat.Make sure your wild game meat is wild rather than farmed. Sometimes deer and boar are farmed just like cows and sheep are, and this farmed “wild” meat can have a much higher environmental impact than truly wild meat. A study in Scotland, for example, found that farmed venison had a greater carbon footprint than beef or lamb.7Buy local meat. This can dramatically reduce its carbon footprint, and often provides a fairer price for local suppliers. Some countries have certification schemes to help people make informed choices – the Scottish Quality Wild Venison (SQWV)8 label ensures the quality and traceability of meat, for example.Dr Rob McMorran, who researches land use policy at SRUC, Scotland’s Rural College, gave his advice: “As well as looking for certification schemes and choosing local produce, people wanting to buy wild meat can talk to their butchers. Many do a good range, and this is largely in response to demand. It will only be stocked if people ask for it.”
References Kelley Oakes (2019). Do you know the carbon footprint of these common foods? FoodUnfolded. Accessed 22 June 2020 Kelley Oakes (2019). Do you know the water footprint of these common foods? FoodUnfolded. Accessed 22 June 2020 C. Herruzo, María Martínez Jáuregui (2013). Trends in hunters, hunting grounds and big game harvest in Spain. Forest Systems. Accessed 22 June 2020 Oliver Keuling et al. Mortality rates of wild boar Sus scrofa L. in central Europe. European Journal of Wildlife Research. Accessed 22 June 2020 Marco Fialaa, Davide Marveggio, Roberto Viganò, Eugenio Demartini, Luca Noninia, Anna Gaviglio (2020). LCA and wild animals: Results from wild deer culled in a northern Italy hunting district. Journal of Cleaner Production. Accessed 22 June 2020 Anna Gaviglio, Maria Elena Marescotti, Eugenio Demartini (2018). The local value chain of hunted red deer meat: a scenario analysis based on a northern Italian case study. Resources. Accessed 22 June 2020 Hollie Riddell (2018). An investigation of greenhouse gas emissions that arise from venison production in Scotland 2018. Accessed 22 June 2020 Scottish Quality Wild Venison. Accessed 22 June 2020. See MoreSee Less