Earth First

Carbon Farming | Is It Really a Solution?

Carbon farming aims to remove carbon from the atmosphere by storing it in plant material and/or the soil. However, carbon farming is space limited, easily reversible and hard to measure, so is it really a solution to removing climate change-inducing emissions from our atmosphere?

How does carbon farming work?

Carbon constantly cycles from the Earth into the atmosphere and back again. Carbon can be stored in several ways - in rocks and sediments, as well as oceans, the atmosphere and in living organisms. Some of the stores, such as in rocks, are long-term forms of carbon capture, while others, such as in living organisms, are short-term. Eventually, stored carbon will be released back into the atmosphere when fossil fuels are burned, animals die, or when grasslands and forests that store carbon die and decompose.

Carbon farming has recently been touted as a win-win option for combatting increasing carbon dioxide emissions by increasing agricultural productivity while also removing emissions from the atmosphere.1 There are two main sectors of carbon storage: biological and geological. Carbon farming focuses primarily on biological, aiming to sequester carbon in soils, grasslands, forests and oceans.2 

Carbon farming in practice

One biological practice used to store carbon is agroforestry, which combines trees, crops and livestock on the same area of land. With multiple plant species having roots in the ground year-round, plants can continue to draw carbon from the atmosphere and into the land where other crops are able to benefit from increased carbon in the soil. This process also helps to decrease greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from forested ecosystems by discouraging farmers from removing trees and bushes in order to grow crops. Given that deforestation currently accounts for roughly a fifth of global greenhouse gas emissions, avoiding this can have significant impacts on agricultural GHG emissions.3,4

A farmer harvests chontaduro fruit, one of the region’s most popular street foods, near El Tambo, Colombia. Chontaduro fruit are often cultivated by smallholders in agroforestry farms in the Pacific lowlands of Colombia. (Photo by Jan Sochor via Getty Imag

A farmer harvests chontaduro fruit, one of the region’s most popular street foods, near El Tambo, Colombia. Chontaduro fruit are often cultivated by smallholders in agroforestry farms in the Pacific lowlands of Colombia. (Photo by Jan Sochor via Getty Images)

Preserving carbon sinks

Other practices of human-driven carbon sequestration focus on maintaining biodiverse landscapes. Wetlands, for example, capture carbon through photosynthesis from the plants rooted into them. The carbon captured by plants in wetlands is then passed into the waterlogged soil, where it is stored for longer periods than drier soils.

Plants and crops can also grow faster in waterlogged soil than they can decompose, meaning the plants can capture more carbon over their lifetime than those grown in drier soils. When the plants do die and decompose, the carbon stored in their leaves and shoots is trapped in the wetland’s waterlogged soil, creating important carbon sinks.5,6

Meadows, swales and reed beds make up the Binsenberg peatlands in Germany. Peatlands function as nutrient filters and contribute not only to climate and species protection, but also to improving water quality. (Jens Büttner/picture alliance via Getty Image

Meadows, swales and reed beds make up the Binsenberg peatlands in Germany. Peatlands function as nutrient filters and contribute not only to climate and species protection, but also to improving water quality. (Jens Büttner/picture alliance via Getty Images)

In peatlands, the slow pace of decomposition allows waste to accumulate and form peat, which continues to hold the carbon originally stored in the plants. This produces extremely fertile soils and in lowland areas peatlands are perfect for growing vegetables, fruits and cereals. Upland peatlands are often used to graze beef and lamb.

Correctly managed, peatlands can store carbon permanently. However, failure to maintain the sites, either by draining them or ending management practices, can lead to the release of emissions held in the plants. In 2017, drained peatlands contributed five per cent of the EU’s total greenhouse gas emissions.7

Despite peatlands only making up 3% of the global land surface, they are believed to store nearly 550 billion tonnes of carbon. That is nearly twice as much as in the world’s forests combined. 8

Cover crops

Farmers and land managers are, however, more likely to focus on carbon farming processes that aid soil structure and productivity, such as cover crops. These cover crops - such as oats, wheat or turnips - are planted in between cash crop seasons and are often not intended to be harvested. The roots and shoots of these cover crops feed soil organisms such as bacteria, fungi and earthworms, adding to the soil’s carbon level over time.9

Some studies have shown positive results for cover cropping, finding they did not cause a decline in yields nor carbon losses prevalent in other systems, such as organic manure applications.9 However, others revealed no significant increase in carbon capture.10 Scientific consensus is not clear on whether cover cropping has real blanket benefits, but it does indicate that the method’s efficacy depends largely on the site and how well it is managed.11 Cover crops are also suspected to be most effective as a long-term project with plants sown for multiple years in a row.12 This is because the method often only generates returns after two or three years, but not in the first 12 months.13

Do the peaks outweigh the pitfalls?

Carbon farming can be a viable mitigation system to remove carbon from the atmosphere, but it is also a small-scale solution which does little to counteract the long-term problems associated with food sustainability and climate change.14

The biggest issue with carbon farming is that it can be easily reversed if techniques are not applied continuously over an extended time frame.15 For example, ending a project to rewet a drained peatland can cause water levels to subside, leading to the release of carbon stored in the peat.16

Overgrazing can cause peat hags to form, exposing the peat surface to dry out and blow/wash away. (Wayne Hutchinson via Getty Images)

Overgrazing can cause peat hags to form, exposing the peat surface to dry out and blow/wash away. (Wayne Hutchinson via Getty Images)

Carbon farming also only focuses on storing carbon in plants, shrubs, trees and soils. While growing more plants creates more space for carbon sequestration, there is a finite area of land available for growth and therefore a finite amount of carbon that can be stored on land. The effects of carbon farming are generally greatest in the beginning, especially in carbon-depleted soils, when most of this space is available. However, research indicates that sequestration plateaus after plants and soils reach their natural level of saturation - usually after 20 to 35 years, depending on the soil type.17

For carbon farming to be considered a solution to climate change, farmers and land managers must maintain these stores, even as their ability to capture new carbon decreases. However, there are economic challenges to this as current financial incentivisation models reward farmers only for sequestering carbon, not maintaining the stores – a practice key to the viability of carbon farming.

Heyang Yellow River Wetland Nature Reserve, where in recent years the local government has carried out the work of

Heyang Yellow River Wetland Nature Reserve, where in recent years the local government has carried out the work of "returning farmland to water and wetlands". (CFOTO/Future Publishing via Getty Images)

Costs for farmers

The EU and Belgian organisation, Soil Service, has said it will pay farmers to follow carbon farming techniques based on actions taken between an initial carbon measurement and another taken at a later date.18 The Soil Service uses the Verified Carbon Standard, a system administered by non-profit organisation VERRA which certifies carbon emissions reductions, to measure the carbon sequestered and sell carbon credits.

However, there are some risks associated with using this method of paying based on the amount of additional carbon stored between measurements. Helena Vanrespaille, a researcher at the Soil Service Belgium, described the method of paying on the premise of visible change as “risky”, because there is a possibility that “the second measure will not show enough carbon storage to justify the payments that have been made in the meantime”.

While it can help some farmers in transition, it can also incidentally punish farmers who have adapted to store more carbon earlier, and as a result, already have high carbon storage in the soil, she explained. There are also other problems including the difficulty of accurately measuring the efficacy of carbon farming itself. This is because the effects are easily reversed, and accurate measurement relies on knowing how much carbon the plants were storing before carbon farming practices were applied.16

Scientists must therefore interpret carbon storage numbers conservatively, often relying on lower estimates of the possible carbon stores, making it difficult to place a true value on the efficacy of carbon farming and undermining attempts to financially incentivise farmers and land managers to follow the practices.

Should carbon farming be our focus?

Carbon farming is already widely pushed as a viable method of carbon capture in Belgium, France and Germany, but many scientists see it as “part of the solution” rather than a silver bullet.19

Payment systems which financially reward carbon sequestration need to be improved to prevent farmers from being forced to front investment in carbon farming practices before there is any possibility of return. Affordable and efficient technology capable of measuring and tracking carbon capture must be rolled out wholescale to help tackle this issue or a lack of accurate measures will remain a barrier to wider uptake. Additionally, current systems still rely heavily on farmers to bear the brunt of the costs associated with the transition to climate-positive practices.20 However, action is needed at all stages of the food value chain to make carbon farming a viable solution.

Eric Toensmeier, Director of Perennial Agriculture Institute, told FoodUnfolded that carbon sequestration is “an important part of mitigation” but admitted it “cannot do the job alone”. He said “many practices are already quite widely adopted and growing quickly” but warned the changes are “not at the scale or pace needed without some big policy changes.”

“It is potentially reversible if there is a change back to carbon-unfriendly farming or climate change brings intense prolonged drought or intense fire. We cannot rely on it alone.”

Meanwhile, Vanrespaille said carbon farming was an important “part of the solution” but only if “done well”. She said, “carbon capture is the only way to reverse the historical emission of carbon and carbon farming will play a part in facilitating that. However, it must be emphasised that we have to cut our carbon emissions, otherwise carbon farming will be like filling a bucket full of holes. I expect that within a decade, farmers will be fully aware of carbon farming and be talking about carbon storage and discussing the price of a tonne of carbon as part of their work.”

Related articles

Most viewed

Earth First

Plant-Based Milk Alternatives | Environmental Footprints

Katharina Kropshofer

Many of us already choose plant-based alternatives to dairy products, others might be wondering…

Human Stories

Why Producing More Food Doesn’t Mean Less Hunger

Lauren Lewis

Our population hit the 8 billion mark in November 2022 and is projected to top 10 billion by 2050.…

Earth First

Creating Healthy Soils | Could Apps be The Answer?

Lina Dilly

Soil is one of our most valuable resources. In agriculture, soil quality does not only determine…

Earth First

COVID-19 | Impacts On Food Waste

Madhura Rao,Dr Alie de Boer

Food supply chains are complex systems with carefully orchestrated operations spread across the…

Earth First

Spirulina | How It’s Grown

Katharina Kropshofer

The blue-green algae spirulina might feel like a modern food, but Indigenous people in Mexico and…

Earth First

Plastic Alternatives: Start-Up Challenges

Claudia Parms

The European Parliament officially announced this year that non-essential single-use plastics will…

Earth First

Farming For Gender Equality | Agroecology in Practice

Emily Payne

Small-scale farming communities across the world are using agroecology to simultaneously tackle food…

Human Stories

The Indian Farmers Battling Climate Change With 10,000-year-old Emmer Wheat

Sanket Jain

Across India, farmers have been reporting major losses at the hands of recurring climate disasters.…

Earth First

How Does Colour Affect The Way We Eat?

Dr Caroline Wood

It's often said that "we eat with our eyes" and science shows this is true - colour plays an…

Earth First

Nutritional Yeast: How It’s Made

Samanta Oon

Nutritional yeast—golden powdery flakes that add a whiff of nutty, cheesy umami when sprinkled…

Earth First

Fungi in Sustainable Food Production

Anne Reshetnyak

Fungi are not just fun to forage and delicious to eat, they can also be useful for food…

Earth First

Plant-Based Iron Sources

Angelika Schulz,Klaus Hadwiger

As a central component of red blood cells (which store and carry oxygen through our bodies) iron is…

  1. Sharma, M., Kaushal, R., Kaushik, P., Ramakrishna, S. (2021) Carbon Farming: Prospects and Challenges. Sustainability, 13, 11122. Accessed 7 June 2022.
  2. World Agroforestry (Undated). Reducing emissions through agroforestry. Accessed 5 December 2022.
  3. Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities of the Australian Government and the Wetlands and Waterbirds Taskforce. (2012). The Role of Wetlands in the Carbon Cycle. Accessed September 12 2022.
  4. European Environmental Bureau and Bird Life International. (2022) Peatlands and wetlands in the new CAP: too little action to protect and restore. Bird Life. Accessed 4 August 2022.
  5. Clark, A. (2015) Cover crops for sustainable crop rotation. Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education. Accessed 4 August 2022.
  6. Kirschey, T. (2021). Multi-stakeholder Landscape and Technical Innovation leading to Peatland Ecosystem Restoration. European Commission, LIFE Public Database. Accessed 5 December 2022.
  7. UN Environment Programme (Undated). Protecting Peatlands for people and planet. Accessed 5 December 2022.
  8. Poeplau, C., and Don, A. (2015). Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils via cultivation of cover crops—a meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 200, 33–41. Accessed 4 August 2022.
  9. Oliveira, F. É. R., Oliveira, J. M., and Xavier, F. A. S. (2016). Changes in soil organic carbon fractions in response to cover crops in an orange orchard. Scielo Brasil. Pages Accessed 4 August 2022.
  10. Gomez, J. A. (2017) Sustainability using cover crops in Mediterranean tree crops, olives and vines – Challenges and current knowledge. Hung. Geogr, Bull. 66, 13-28. Accessed 4 August 2022.
  11. Tang, K. Kragt. M, Hailu, A. Ma, C. (2016) Carbon farming economics: What have we learned? Journal of Environmental Management. Accessed 7 June 2022.
  12. Myers, R., Weber, A., Tellatin, S. (2019) Opportunities to improve your bottom line in row crops. Cover crop economics, Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education.
  13. Toensmeier, E. (2019). Carbon Farming: A solution to climate change? Journal of International Affairs. Accessed 13 June 2022.
  14. Flessa, H., Don, A., Jacobs, A., Dechow, R., Tiemever, B., Poeplau, C. (2019). Humus in landwirtschaftlich genutzten Böden Deutschlands. Bundesministerium fur Ernahrung und Landwirtschaft. Accessed August 4 2022.
  15. Appunn, K. (2022) Carbon farming explained: the pros, the cons and the EU's plans. Clean Energy Wire. Accessed August 4 2022.
  16. Nyssens, C. (2021) Carbon Farming for climate, nature and farmers. European Environmental Bureau. Accessed August 4 2022.
  17. Nijman, P. (2021) Flemish farmers union and Soil Service of Belgium collaborate with CO2 platform Claire. North Sear Region Carbon Farming. Accessed August 4 2022.
  18. Mattila, T., Hagelberg, E., Söderlund, S., Joona, J. (2022) How farmers approach soil carbon sequestration? Lessons learned from 105 carbon-farming plans. Soil and Tillage Research Volume 215. Accessed 13 June 2022.
See MoreSee Less

Keep updated with the latest news about your food with our newsletter

Follow Us