The Future

AquAdvantage Salmon, The Only Genetically Modified Fish On The Market

The AquAdvantage salmon grows twice as fast as its wild counterpart, and is already being sold commercially. But are these fish as unethical and dangerous as some would suggest, or a useful tool to fight food insecurity and environmental challenges?

In 1989, American company AquaBounty Technologies begun developing a new genetically engineered breed of Atlantic salmon that could grow twice as fast as an Atlantic salmon in the wild.1 And while the AquAdvantage salmon was still a long way from being approved for commercial production or sales, the potential of genetically modified (GM) animal products on our supermarket shelves quickly went from hypothetical to a viable reality.1 

In 2015, this hypothetical became a reality. After years of discussion, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved AquAdvantage salmon to become the world’s first genetically modified animal approved for commercial production and consumption.2 Now, with fresh discussions around new genetic techniques back on the EU agenda, the decade long story of the AquaAdvantage salmon could offer us a looking glass into the future and challenges of GMOs.

Why GMOs?

Over the past decade, Atlantic salmon populations have reached an all time low. In 2020, Atlantic salmon catches amounted to 915 tonnes, marking a decline of 19% and 29% compared to the average catches of the preceding five and ten years, respectively.3 But even before the AquAdvantage salmon was approved to be commercialised, populations were in a steep decline with no clear signs of improving.4,5 Salmon farming quickly emerged as a viable solution to meet the demand of waning wild capture fisheries, and today, around 70% of global salmon production comes from aquaculture, with the majority of production ending up in higher income countries. The industry has grown so much, that farmed salmon alone represented over 16% of the entire aquaculture export industry’s value in 2019.6

But over the past decades it’s become clear that salmon farming presents several concerns of its own - like pollution flowing into nearby waterways, the impacts of antibiotic use, and unsustainable reliance on wild fish as a key component of feed. There’s also the issue of selectively bred farmed salmon escaping into the wild, where they can cause damage to the already struggling wild populations by competing for the same food, spreading pathogens and parasites, and weakening the genetics of wild salmon through interbreeding.7,17 

In August 2023, Iceland faced one of its largest escapes in recent years when thousands of farmed salmon escaped from a pen in Patreksfjörður. With estimates from the Norwegian Marine Research Institute suggesting that the average number of yearly escaped salmon from Icelandic farms is almost double the total wild population, escapes have raised serious environmental concerns.

AquaBounty Technologies emerged with the AquAdvantage salmon as a proposed solution to these concerns - stating that their new look salmon is antibiotic free, sterile, and requires 25% less feed than regular farm raised salmon to reach market size.8 On top of this, they were also engineered to grow twice as fast as the regular salmon, reaching market size in significantly less time - offering a win for producers too.1 To achieve this, AquaBounty modify their salmon by removing the typical growth-hormone regulating gene in the Atlantic salmon, and replacing it with the growth hormone regulating gene from the faster-growing Chinook salmon and a promoter sequence from another fish, the ocean pout. This sequence is like a genetic "on-switch" that regulates when and where in the body the growth-hormone regulating gene is expressed. Combined, these modifications allow the salmon to grow year-round instead of only during summer and spring, when regular Atlantic salmon see greater growth.1

Genetic engineering allows us to alter an organisms' genetic material, either enhancing existing traits or introducing new ones. Genetic modification, a controversial genetic engineering technique, involves transferring genes from one species into another species’ DNA, creating transgenic or genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

While the proponents argue GMOs like the AquaAdvantage salmon offer a number of benefits, debates persist over ethical, socio-economic, and environmental concerns that come with unnaturally meddling with the DNA of plants and animals.9

Aquabounty AquAdvantage salmon can reach adult size in 16 to 18 months instead of 36 months for regular Atlantic salmon. These transgenic salmon eat 25 per cent less feed and are about 20 per cent more efficient at converting that food to flesh. 

The criticisms

Before the AquAdvantage salmon had even been accepted by the FDA for commercialisation, environmental advocacy groups, consumer rights organisations, animal welfare activists, and segments of the scientific community were quick to offer their critique. Terms like “Frankenfish” found their way into the headlines and it became clear that opinions were split on the new super-salmon.10 While the list of critiques by anti-groups is long, they were broadly centred around a few key concerns.

1. Lack of transparency

Some of the criticisms of AquAdvantage salmon were related to the approval process and a lack of transparency surrounding the labelling of genetically modified foods for consumers. The U.S. FDA regulates genetically engineered foods through a process that prohibits the agency from disclosing information obtained during review to the public. This lack of transparency raised concerns about how much public oversight and input was acknowledged in the approval.11 

Labelling requirements also raised concerns. Initially, the FDA did not require labelling for the genetically modified salmon, stating that it was similar to the wild variety. However, consumer advocacy groups have argued that the consumers have the right to know if their food has been genetically modified, leading to the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Act, which mandates labelling for GMOs, including AquAdvantage salmon. Despite this, exemptions for restaurants and some retail settings limit consumer access to information about the presence of genetically modified salmon in their food, highlighting ongoing challenges in ensuring transparency in the food supply chain.11

2. Health concerns

Genetically modifying any organism may introduce new proteins or allergens into the food that were not present in the original organism. While these additions can be harmless, they can also trigger allergic reactions in sensitive individuals that were not previously sensitive to the original unaltered product. This common and well-founded food safety concern also applies to AquAdvantage salmon.12 

Over the past decades, major medical groups have presented research and released statements highlighting that there is actually no evidence that a modified product presents any unique safety risk to human health compared to conventionally bred products.11 However, it has also been clearly emphasised that different GMOs have different inserted genes, and as a result, their potential impact to human health should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis before they become available in the public market.13 Regarding the specific case of the AquAdvantage salmon, the FDA and the Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat concluded that AquAdvantage salmon does not present any additional risk to human health compared to wild salmon.2,14

3. Environmental issues

In 2004, transgenic salmon was shown to present a potential threat to wild populations under certain conditions if it escaped to the surrounding environment, with the researchers requesting for this to be taken into special consideration.15,16 Considering over one million domesticated salmon were reported to have escaped Scottish farms alone, between 2002 and 2006, escaped fish from net pens into the wild remains a valid concern to this day.17

However, there are ways to navigate this risk. For example, environmental harm appears to decrease significantly when the fish are raised in contained land-based farms, with an additional biological containment, like by breeding only one sex, or sterilising the transgenic fish so they aren’t able to breed with wild populations if they were to escape.17 According to AquaBounty technologies, to comply with the FDA’s requirements on this matter, their salmon are all sterile females raised in well contained inland facilities.8 The FDA and the Fisheries and the Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat concluded that these measures significantly reduce the risk of the AquAdvantage salmon’s environmental impact to ‘extremely low’.2, 14

Learn more about the impacts of salmon hatcheries on wild populations

But this didn’t seem to appease the concerns of some, and in 2020 a federal judge in San Francisco ruled that the FDA needed to better investigate the potential environmental effects of the AquAdvantage salmon were it to escape to the wild.19 After further investigation, the FDA maintained that, given the low likelihood of the salmon escaping and interbreeding with wild Atlantic salmon, their potential impact on the environment is in fact ‘extremely low’.2

There are also some indications that domesticated transgenic fish do not fare well in the wild, however researchers call for more research on the matter to better understand the potential impact of transgenic fish in the wild.20

A view of AquaBounty Technologies inland farm in northeast Indiana. The farm is capable of raising 1,200 metric tons of salmon each year. Photo courtesy of AquaBounty.

What is the future of genetically engineered fish?

So far, the AquAdvantage salmon is still the only commercially available GMO fish worldwide for human consumption. It is also only being sold in the USA and Canada - with no other international governments, including the EU, showing any clear will to seriously consider GM salmon production or sales within their own borders.

The unsolved debates around ethics and responsibility also persist. While GMOs are seen by some as an unethical and irresponsible way to solve some of today’s problems, several organisations and researchers have recognised it as a potentially useful new tool to address issues like overfishing, food security, food safety, and resource use. Professor Andreas Boecker, who studies consumer perception of agricultural technologies at the University of Guelph, told FoodUnfolded that resistance to GMOs also often stems from “A longing for what is natural and the simpler way of living; a general distrust in the food industry; and what we have seen becoming more intense over the last 10 years, a general distrust in science.”

Read more on the current EU gene-editing debate here

However, even proponents of GM agree that it should only be used with extreme care, following strict regulations and monitoring by both scientific and regulatory entities. Professor Rex Dunham from the School of Fisheries Aquaculture and Aquatic Sciences at Auburn University, told FoodUnfolded that while it’s hard to know how long it will take, “In the future of feeding people and protecting the environment, most farmed fish will be genetically improved. And if that allows us to grow food with a smaller footprint, that’s good for society. However, we do need to choose the proper approaches responsibly. We have to be logical and well aware of the adverse and beneficial effects in all cases. Choosing the right traits and approaches is important.” Further stating that “Adopting a conservative gradual approach, integrating sterilisation and other safeguards is how we need to proceed.” 

With the current resistance to accept GMOs in many countries worldwide, it’s clear this technology still has a long way to go before it garners wider consumer trust, which according to Professor Andreas Boecker, requires a deep understanding of the current food systems we have in place. “We need to compare the effects of genetic engineering to the ones of the current food systems. And many people who are against it, compare it to an inexistent ideal world where everything is organic.” 

Whether GMO fish will ever become an integral part of food systems worldwide, only the future can tell. However, this clearly can’t happen without a dramatic shift in public perception of GMOs. This required shift underscores just how important early stakeholder engagement is if GM producers are to establish trust and transparency among all involved parties.21 There’s also more work needed to better understand exactly how genetically engineered animals would truly compare to their traditionally bred counterparts with respect to their impacts on society, the environment, animal welfare and ethics. Finally, we’re going to need robust monitoring and regulatory frameworks to make sure we’re consistent with our application of genetic engineering techniques to our food.

Related articles

Most viewed

The Future

Why We Haven’t Been To Mars Yet | Space Food Technology

Keeren Flora

Going to space is a major undertaking and takes its toll on the body. Nutrition is just one area…

Earth First

What Will We See in Farms of the Future?

Claudia Lee

With agriculture accounting for almost one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions, the impacts of…

The Future

Traceability in the Food System

Luke Cridland

Where has food come from, and where is it going? Knowing this is crucial to sustaining food supply…

The Future

What Are Novel Foods and How Are They Approved?

Madhura Rao

Yellow mealworms were the first insect approved for human consumption in the EU. As a novel food,…

Human Stories

The World Of Hunting on the West Coast of Norway | Interview

Jane Alice Liu

What is the world of hunting like? I sat down with Susanne Tonheim to hear about her experience…

The Future

AquAdvantage Salmon, The Only Genetically Modified Fish On The Market

Maria Pinto

The AquAdvantage salmon grows twice as fast as its wild counterpart, and is already being sold…

The Future

Circular Microfarms | What They Can Teach Us

Annabel Slater

Many modern-day farms are huge, covering hundreds or even thousands of acres. But can a one-acre…

Human Stories

Fairtrade Certification | How Does Fairtrade Work?

Jane Alice Liu

In low-income regions, small-scale agriculture is the biggest source of income, job security and…

The Future

EU Green Deal: 5 Ways Policy Might Impact Our Food System

Madhura Rao

The European Commission recently announced a "Farm to Fork" strategy that aims to make the food…

The Future

Food Forests | Sustainable Agriculture, Nature’s Way

Lina Dilly

Discover how food forests could future proof our food systems.

Earth First

How Forgotten Crops Help Combat Climate Change

Luke Cridland

Agriculture is one of the biggest contributors to climate change, with 18.4% of global greenhouse…

The Future

Aquaponics | Sustainable Urban Farming

Samanta Oon

When you think of aquaponics, you might imagine a cutting-edge, modern farm. This can be true, but…

  1. ICES (2021). Working Group on North Atlantic Salmon (WGNAS). ICES Scientific Reports. Report.
  2. OSPAR Assessment Portal. Status Assessment 2022 - Atlantic salmon. Accessed 22/03/2024
  3. Goubau, A. (2011). The AquAdvantage Salmon Controversy–A Tale of Aquaculture, Genetically Engineered Fish and Regulatory Uncertainty.
  4. Thornber, K., Verner‐Jeffreys, D., Hinchliffe, S., Rahman, M. M., Bass, D., & Tyler, C. R. (2020). Evaluating antimicrobial resistance in the global shrimp industry.
  5. Quiñones, R. A., Fuentes, M., Montes, R. M., Soto, D., & León‐Muñoz, J. (2019). Environmental issues in Chilean salmon farming: a review. Reviews in aquaculture,
  6. AquaBounty. Why AquaBounty Salmon. Accessed 22/03/2024.
  7. Klümper, W., & Qaim, M. (2014). A meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops. PloS one, 9(11), e111629. 10 Livescience. Frankenfish on the Menu? FDA Gives Initial Approval. Accessed 22/03/2024
  8. CBC. FDA approval of AquaBounty GMO salmon decried by environmentalists. Accessed 22/03/2024.
  9. Amescua, A. (2023). Perspectives and Predicaments on GE Salmon. In Farm Animal Welfare Law (pp. 35-50). CRC Press.
  10. Upton, H. F., & Cowan, T. (2015). 'Genetically engineered salmon'. Congressional Research Service.
  11. World Health Organization. (2014) Food, genetically modified (Q&A). Accessed 7/04/2024.
  12. McGowan, C., Mimeault, C., Stefanov, I., Leggatt, R., & Beardall, J. (2021). Environmental and Indirect Human Health Risk Assessment of the AquAdvantage® Salmon. Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS).
  13. Richard D. Howard et al., “Transgenic Male Mating Advantage Provides Opportunity for Trojan Gene Effect in a Fish,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
  14. Robert H. Devlin et al., “Population Effects of Growth Hormone Transgenic Coho Salmon Depend on Food Availability and Genotype by Environment Interactions,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  15. Atalah, J., & Sanchez-Jerez, P. (2020). Global assessment of ecological risks associated with farmed fish escapes. Global Ecology and Conservation
  16. Delvin: Robert H. Devlin, L. Fredrik Sundström, Rosalind A. Leggatt, Assessing Ecological and Evolutionary Consequences of Growth-Accelerated Genetically Engineered Fishes
  17. United States district court, northern district of California. 2020. Case No. 16-cv-01574-VC Order granting in part and denying in part plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment; granting in part and denying in part defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment.
  18. Dunham, R. (2023). Aquaculture and fisheries biotechnology: genetic approaches. Cabi
  19. Callegari, B., & Mikhailova, O. (2021). RRI and corporate stakeholder engagement: the aquadvantage salmon case. Sustainability, 13(4), 1820.
See MoreSee Less

Keep updated with the latest news about your food with our newsletter

Follow Us