Do you care about the food system? Take part in our Annual Survey 2024

Take the survey
The Future

5 Ways To Lower Cattle Methane Emissions

Cows are increasingly seen as climate criminals alongside cars and aeroplanes. Livestock is being called out as a major cause of climate change more and more often, and methane emissions from cattle digestion are an important part of the problem. Researchers are investigating several approaches that could help reduce these emissions - but how much of a difference can they really make?

A study by the FAO (the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN) states that raising livestock accounts for 14.5% of all man-caused greenhouse gas emissions, with 65% of this attributable to cattle. It is becoming clear beyond doubt that large-scale beef production is a significant driver of the changing climate. 

As our appetite for meat increases on a global scale, both the number of livestock and the urgency with which we must combat global warming are rising. Researchers are therefore exploring five key approaches to drastically reduce the methane emissions of our cattle herds.

1. Tinkering with the cow’s diet 

One possibility to reduce methane emissions from cows is adjusting the balance of their feed, for instance, by adding more corn. “Grass contains a lot of fibres, which cause hydrogen gas to be produced as they are broken down”, explains Dorien Van Wesemael from the Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO). She examined the impact of feed composition and additives on reducing methane emissions from cattle as part of her PhD. “Microorganisms in the cow’s gut will then convert that hydrogen gas into methane.”

“The breakdown of starch from corn, on the other hand, consumes hydrogen gas. The right combination of grass and corn as feed, therefore, has the potential to reduce methane production - but it’s important to make sure that the cow’s well-being and production efficiency aren’t jeopardised. In terms of nutritional value, grass and corn aren’t just interchangeable.” Professor Theun Vellinga from the Department of Livestock and Environment at the Dutch Wageningen University agrees: 

“There is a rather limited margin for change in terms of adjusting cattle feed. Feeding corn to cattle reduces methane emissions by 7 to 10%, but too much corn will result in an unbalanced diet.”

Plus, you have to look at the bigger picture. “Growing more corn would mean ploughing up pasture-land into fields, and doing so would cause that soil to release large amounts of CO2 currently stored in it. The benefit in terms of methane emissions is therefore lost. It would take 30 to 60 years to balance out those CO2 emissions from the soil with reduced methane emissions from cattle that are fed more corn.”   

2. Adding supplements that slow down the production of methane 

Another option is adding new supplements to cattle feed. Various experiments showed that adding seaweed to cattle feed produced drastic methane reductions. In experiments with artificial cow rumens, for instance, mixing red algae (Asparagopsis taxiformis) in the feed reduced methane production by more than 90%. But working with an artificial stomach is very different from an actual living cow, so adding red algae to cattle feed is still in its research stage. It remains unclear how it could be applied on a large scale and what the long-term effects would be.  

Read more about whether adding seaweed to feed could help reduce methane emissions from cows.

ILVO is also investigating the effect of other feed additives besides seaweed. “The two most promising possibilities are flaxseed and an additive called 3NOP”, Dorien Van Wesemael explains. “Both work very differently. Flaxseed is a high-fat concentrate, and fat interferes with the breakdown of fibres in the rumen. Methane production decreases, but at the same time, more undigested fibres will end up in the manure, which will start to ferment there, so it’s not clear yet how this would impact the methane given off by manure.”

“3NOP (3-Nitrooxypropanol), on the other hand, is a supplement specifically developed to slow down methane production. Experiments show that 3NOP yields a 20% to 30% reduction in methane emissions in both dairy and meat cattle without impacting production… but it’s a temporary effect, so if farmers stop administering 3NOP, then methane emissions rise again.” The Dutch feed company Royal DSM is currently working on commercialising 3NOP in the near future.   

3. Breeding climate-friendly cows 

Not every cow belches out the same amount of methane, since the balance of microorganisms in the rumen differs from cow to cow. The entire composition of the bacterial community in the rumen is connected with the genetics of cows, which makes it possible to select cows that emit less methane, according to Professor Vellinga.

“There are considerable differences between cows in terms of methane emissions, and it looks very much as though these can be traced to the animal’s genetics,”  Vellinga reports. “There’s lots of potential there. Thanks to advances in emission measurement technology and genetic sequencing. Currently, cattle are selected for breeding based on how productive they are, but now that the pressure’s rising to do something about greenhouse gas emissions, there’s also a growing interest to include their emissions in the breeding selection criteria.” 

“With the genetic diversity we see, we can realize a 1% reduction in methane emission per year through selective breeding. If we keep this up long enough, I estimate a 20% reduction is quite feasible. Combined with other methods, this is definitely a promising lead.”

4. Capturing methane

No, not with a mouth mask and a gas tank - but by purifying the air in livestock stables to remove methane. The captured gas could even be utilized, for instance, as an energy source; after all, one single cow emits enough methane to keep a pilot flame burning continuously. 

“That is still a long way off, though”, thinks Carel De Vries, Director of Courage, a Dutch organisation that initiates innovation projects in dairy farming. Together with the Delft University of Technology, Courage evaluated the feasibility of methane capture. “Our concept consisted of a biological filter for removing methane from the air in the stables using methane-eating bacteria. These bacteria convert methane into a kind of bacterial protein which could be used as a fertilizer.”

The design encountered technical difficulties, de Vries recounts. “Since the air volume in a stable is quite large, such a biological filter would have to be almost as big as the stable to reach enough capacity. A second problem is that the methane concentration in the stable air is too low to make these methane-eating bacteria grow. Concentrating the methane first is an option, but that turned out to be too complicated and also just too expensive. Other systems, such as removing methane with filters or burning methane, face the same obstacles.”

Another problem presents in capturing methane: it’s only possible when the cattle are brought into the stables. When a cow is in the field, the emissions just evaporate, de Vries says. 

“To make methane capture work, you would have to keep the cattle in the stables. And there we have a conflict between environmental purposes and animal welfare. We care very much about outdoor grazing, and cattle are already put inside enough as it is.”

5. Decreasing livestock numbers 

A final approach to reducing methane emissions is as simple as it is contentious: decreasing livestock numbers. Less cattle, less methane. Is it as simple as that? Perhaps not. 

Decreasing livestock numbers indeed reduces greenhouse gas emissions and has a big impact on land use. But if this only happens locally and consumers keep eating the same amount of meat, the problem just gets shifted, Vellinga puts it. “As long as we keep consuming the same amounts of meat and dairy, they will be produced elsewhere. Adjusting livestock numbers isn’t necessarily pointless, but without reduced demand for meat and dairy, it won’t make that much of a difference in terms of greenhouse gas emissions.” 

Is there a quick solution?

Burping methane is not the only way livestock farming contributes to global warming. Transporting and producing cattle feed, land use change and the handling of manure all contribute. But as the call to reduce the impact of cattle farming, and by extension agriculture as a whole, grows louder and louder, reducing methane emissions becomes more pressing.

Discover the benefits of animal agriculture

As demand for beef and dairy products keeps rising globally, researchers are looking at reducing methane emissions as a fast solution to reduce the environmental impact of livestock. The only questions are how, by how much, and how quickly. “With what’s on the table now, a 10% reduction in methane emissions from cattle is feasible in the near future”, Vellinga says. “In the long run, I think selective cattle breeding combined with additives can cut methane emissions in half.”

But other than reducing consumers’ demand for beef and dairy products, “there is no miracle solution available”, cautions Nico Peiren from ILVO. “Research has provided a couple of possible approaches, but the results aren’t very clear. A short-term 20 to 30% reduction is a very big gain already, but we mustn’t forget that a cow is a complex organism, not a machine - cattle will always emit methane. They are ruminants, after all.” 

The author originally wrote this piece in October 2018 for the Belgian outlet Eos Tracé. Read the piece in Dutch here.

Annual audience survey

Do you careabout thefood system?

Take part in our Annual Survey 2024

Take the survey

Related articles

Most viewed

The Future

Unsustainable Fishing: The Situation in The Mediterranean

Silvia Lazzaris

Almost all fishing is unsustainable, and the only way out is to stop eating fish - these are the…

The Future

Holy cow! Beef without cows?

Luke Cridland, Meghan Horvath

Did you know that scientists have found a way to grow meat in a lab? It may sound crazy, but…

The Future

Milk Production | What Really Drives the Price of Milk?

Katharina Kropshofer

More milk, fewer farmers and a sinking demand - discover why has the price of milk been falling, and…

Earth First

What is “Natural Food”?

Lottie Bingham

Rising demand for "natural" foods has seen the term used as a marketing tool in advertisements and…

Earth First

Amaranth: A staple of the past and a crop for the future

Claudia Lee

From being offered to the Gods by ancient civilisations to being touted as a future crop that can…

Human Stories

Short Food Supply Chains: Limitations of Law

Dr Mirta Alessandrini

Short food supply chains represent a great opportunity to support the shift towards more…

Earth First

How Fig Trees Restore Forests and Biodiversity

Molly Melvin

Widespread reforestation efforts are a key way to mitigate climate change, curtail habitat loss and…

Human Stories

2023 is The International ‘Year of Millets’ | Here’s Why They Matter For Global Food Security

Sanket Jain

Indigenous millets are a nutritious and climate-resilient crop. But in India, their production is…

The Future

How Should We Regulate Genome-Edited Crops? | Opinion

Rebecca Nesbit

Humans have been modifying crop genetics for millennia, but in recent years this practice has…

Earth First

How Forgotten Crops Help Combat Climate Change

Luke Cridland

Agriculture is one of the biggest contributors to climate change, with 18.4% of global greenhouse…

The Future

Permaculture in Svalbard | Ethical Arctic Farming

Jane Alice Liu, Benjamin L. Vidmar

As the northernmost town in the world, Longyearbyen is home to a little over 2000 inhabitants. To…

The Future

Urban Farming | Grow Your Own Food

Kelly Oakes

When we think of farming, we imagine rural landscapes with huge fields extending as far as the eye…

Keep updated with the latest news about your food with our newsletter

Follow Us